What Ps3 Games Are Compatible With Playstation Move
The top five of the best PlayStation Move compatible light gun games that have been released for the PlayStation 3.
Ok i have the sharp shooter and kz3 and i have bought house of the dead 3 and 4. So from those games im guessing that ANY game that uses the move or is move compatible you can use the sharpshooter. Also every button that is on the move/nav controllers are built into the sharpshooter. Now what i would like to know is there a game out there that uses the full funtionality of the sharpshooter.
Such as the full auto semi auto and single shot switch on the sharp shooter. Also on the top of the sharp shooter it looks like they built it to use a scope so are there any games that use the scope or not? CrustyJockStrap wrote: No, Don't think activision is willing to spend cash on implimenting it either. And the back handers from Microsoft will insure that Top titles from Activision Won't have any Advanced features that will make the PS3 version better than Xbox 360. Move is able to do off the rails shooters Very Very easy. Kinect has extreme problems doing that due to no controller usage. Microsoft need to bring out a Nav controller for kinect.
And ditch the no buttons adverts. Ubisoft were not able to remove kinects problems for Ghost recons Full single player like microsoft had hoped.
Which has resulted in Kinect being stuck doing voice commands so far for off the rails shooters. Which is years old game play from back on the first Xbox. Untill kinect works with off the rails shooters doing movement and aiming Activision won't be able to add Move either.
What Ps3 Games Are Compatible With Ps4 Controller
GraphiteGB wrote: CrustyJockStrap wrote: No, Don't think activision is willing to spend cash on implimenting it either. And the back handers from Microsoft will insure that Top titles from Activision Won't have any Advanced features that will make the PS3 version better than Xbox 360. Move is able to do off the rails shooters Very Very easy. Kinect has extreme problems doing that due to no controller usage. Microsoft need to bring out a Nav controller for kinect. And ditch the no buttons adverts.
Ubisoft were not able to remove kinects problems for Ghost recons Full single player like microsoft had hoped. Which has resulted in Kinect being stuck doing voice commands so far for off the rails shooters.
Which is years old game play from back on the first Xbox. Untill kinect works with off the rails shooters doing movement and aiming Activision won't be able to add Move either.
Why did you bring kinect up? Whio cares TBH. Yes games can have Move added regaurdles of what the 360 or Microsoft does. The back handers from Microsoft is just early access to maps which are over prices for a over hyped game IMO. Activision like to take the money hence why they snapped up the cash offer from MS for timmed exclusive crap and not spend it realy.
Having move in game is nothing to do with having kinect in games and vice versa as games as quite a few multiplatfrom games on PS3 use Move and do not use Kinect so that excuse is lame realy. Move is nothing but a glorified wii motion+ and offered nothing the Wii has not done already And kinect is a glorified camara. The wife loves it for Dance central has she does not need hold any controller for it and says it is more natural. But I could not care less TBH So again their was no need to bring Kinect into it or Microsoft my comment was purely at Activision and if they don't get the extra cash to do it they won't. CrustyJockStrap wrote: GraphiteGB wrote: CrustyJockStrap wrote: No, Don't think activision is willing to spend cash on implimenting it either. And the back handers from Microsoft will insure that Top titles from Activision Won't have any Advanced features that will make the PS3 version better than Xbox 360.
Untill kinect works with off the rails shooters doing movement and aiming Activision won't be able to add Move either. Why did you bring kinect up?
Whio cares TBH. Yes games can have Move added regaurdles of what the 360 or Microsoft does. The back handers from Microsoft is just early access to maps which are over prices for a over hyped game IMO.
Activision like to take the money hence why they snapped up the cash offer from MS for timmed exclusive crap and not spend it realy. Having move in game is nothing to do with having kinect in games and vice versa as games as quite a few multiplatfrom games on PS3 use Move and do not use Kinect so that excuse is lame realy. Move is nothing but a glorified wii motion+ and offered nothing the Wii has not done already And kinect is a glorified camara.
The wife loves it for Dance central has she does not need hold any controller for it and says it is more natural. But I could not care less TBH So again their was no need to bring Kinect into it or Microsoft my comment was purely at Activision and if they don't get the extra cash to do it they won't. READ the first & last line again. Activison Is Microsoft loyal.
They won't allow top titlesto have MOVE with out kinect also being supported. The other titles that use Move but don't use kinect are not developed buy Activision owned first line developers and most are not even published by Activison but buy there rivals EA and Ubisoft. With out Kinect working for COD, there won't be MOVE support either.
Kinect is Holding back Activision doing MOVE support for COD series of games because Kinect is unable to do Off the rails shooters and COD is an off the rails shooters. As for who cares, Wake up, the poster you were under cares and wanted to know. Thats the only reason people post and want a reply. ( If there not spammers ). GraphiteGB wrote: CrustyJockStrap wrote: GraphiteGB wrote: CrustyJockStrap wrote: No, Don't think activision is willing to spend cash on implimenting it either. And the back handers from Microsoft will insure that Top titles from Activision Won't have any Advanced features that will make the PS3 version better than Xbox 360.
Untill kinect works with off the rails shooters doing movement and aiming Activision won't be able to add Move either. Why did you bring kinect up? Whio cares TBH. Yes games can have Move added regaurdles of what the 360 or Microsoft does. The back handers from Microsoft is just early access to maps which are over prices for a over hyped game IMO.
Activision like to take the money hence why they snapped up the cash offer from MS for timmed exclusive crap and not spend it realy. Having move in game is nothing to do with having kinect in games and vice versa as games as quite a few multiplatfrom games on PS3 use Move and do not use Kinect so that excuse is lame realy. Move is nothing but a glorified wii motion+ and offered nothing the Wii has not done already And kinect is a glorified camara. The wife loves it for Dance central has she does not need hold any controller for it and says it is more natural. But I could not care less TBH So again their was no need to bring Kinect into it or Microsoft my comment was purely at Activision and if they don't get the extra cash to do it they won't.
READ the first & last line again. Activison Is Microsoft loyal. They won't allow top titlesto have MOVE with out kinect also being supported. The other titles that use Move but don't use kinect are not developed buy Activision owned first line developers and most are not even published by Activison but buy there rivals EA and Ubisoft. With out Kinect working for COD, there won't be MOVE support either. Kinect is Holding back Activision doing MOVE support for COD series of games because Kinect is unable to do Off the rails shooters and COD is an off the rails shooters. As for who cares, Wake up, the poster you were under cares and wanted to know.
Thats the only reason people post and want a reply. ( If there not spammers ) No kinect is not holding back Move! No Activision is not Microsoft loyal What holding Move back is Sony not getting more 3rd party interest and making it a insentive for 3rd partys to add move to the games nothing more. Activision is Money loyal they will do if offered the cash You can't blame Microsoft for SOny's short comings of not willing to part with cash on certain things You were the one who brought Kinect into it nothing to do with move that's why I said who cares I know who publish what again that has nothing to do with what I posted you brought it up not me!
You have a habbit of trying to twist converstation away and make it one console V's the other one in fact it has nothing to do with that. You can be realy helpful some times but other times you can be a right hmm better not it breaks the forum T&C's End of the day If Sony paid Activision to do it they would as Activision is mony hungry and proved that time and time again.